Bitcoin Trust Levels Vary Across Regions: A Survey Analysis
A recent survey conducted by the Cornell Bitcoin Club sheds light on the varying levels of trust in Bitcoin (BTC) across 25 countries. The survey, released on Sept. 3, reveals that Bitcoin scored an average trust rating of 4.67 on a 10-point scale. Interestingly, Nigeria emerged as the leader in global Bitcoin trust levels, while Japan recorded the lowest scores among the surveyed nations.
One of the key findings of the survey is the significant regional variations in perceptions of cryptocurrency. In fact, ten countries reported higher trust in Bitcoin than in their national governments. These countries include Brazil, Indonesia, Kenya, Lebanon, Nigeria, the Philippines, South Africa, Turkey, Ukraine, and Venezuela. This trend suggests that Bitcoin is attracting interest in regions where institutional trust has eroded, positioning it as an alternative to centralized authority.
On the other hand, the survey participants consistently rated Bitcoin as riskier than traditional investment options across all categories. However, there was some alignment with established volatile asset classes, as 45% of respondents considered Bitcoin equally risky compared to stocks, while 43% viewed it as equivalent to corporate bonds.
Questions about Bitcoin’s fraud reduction capabilities, privacy protection, and service provider trustworthiness generated predominantly neutral responses. This indicates a widespread uncertainty about Bitcoin’s practical benefits rather than informed skepticism.
Financial stress levels also played a role in Bitcoin adoption and trust. Countries reporting higher financial stress levels, as measured by responses to “my finances control my life,” generally showed increased Bitcoin ownership and trust. For example, Turkey, India, Kenya, and South Africa recorded the highest financial stress indicators alongside elevated Bitcoin adoption rates.
On the other hand, countries like El Salvador, Switzerland, China, and Italy reported the lowest financial stress levels, correlating with reduced Bitcoin interest. This suggests that Bitcoin may appeal as an alternative financial system in regions experiencing acute economic pressure.
In conclusion, the Cornell study highlights that Bitcoin’s global position is influenced by local economic contexts and institutional trust levels. The data suggest that uncertainty, rather than outright dismissal, characterizes the views of most respondents on cryptocurrency capabilities. This nuanced understanding of Bitcoin trust levels provides valuable insights into the evolving landscape of digital assets.

